Hugo Nomination Thoughts, Long Fiction (and
Dramatic Presentation)
In past years, “Long
Fiction” just meant “Novel”, but this year there is one new category to consider, a Hugo for Best Series Perhaps we should also start thinking about another new award, likely to come along next year (if ratified in Helsinki), for Best Young Adult Fiction (which would not
officially be a Hugo Award, but would be voted on by the same population using the same
rules (as with the Campbell Award for Best New Writer). It does not yet have a
name, the best option (Andre Norton Award) already being taken for the similar
award given by SFWA. (And thanks to Andrew M., commenting at File 770, for reminding me that the YA Award will not be given this year.)
So this is the
point where I confess that I read so much short fiction that I’m not qualified to
rule on Best Novel. I’ve said this every year for the past few years. I always
end up reading my favorite novels a bit too late – so, for instance, I think
the best SF novels of 2014 were Emily St. John Mandel’s Station Eleven and William Gibson’s The Peripheral, but I didn’t read them until 2016. Likewise, for
2015, I didn’t read Jo Walton’s The Just
City until after the Hugos were awarded, and I didn’t finish my favorite
2015 novel, The Buried Giant by
Kazuo Ishiguro, until early 2017. There are, thus, plenty of 2017 novels I
think might be excellent that I haven’t yet read, including The Gradual, by Christopher Priest; Everfair, by Nisi Shawl; Necessity, by Jo Walton; The Winged Histories, by Sofia Samatar; Central Station, by Lavie Tidhar; and Crosstalk, by Connie Willis are six that I already have on hand, and definitely will read, perhaps very soon. I am
sure there are many more. And all that said I can only recommend two novels
from 2017 that I liked a lot, both, as it happens, first novels. (I suppose technically
there are two more pretty good novels that I read and marked as novellas, but
both are eligible as novels: Penric’s
Mission, by Lois McMaster Bujold; and The
Last Days of New Paris, by China MiƩville. One more pretty good novel, also
pretty short but longer than novella length, I think, is Walter Jon Williams’ Impersonations, his latest Praxis story, though as I note below, I don't consider it quite Hugo-worthy.)
The two first
novels I mentioned are All the Birds in
the Sky, by Charlie Jane Anders; and Too
Like the Lightning, by Ada Palmer. Both are fairly seamless mixtures of SF
and Fantasy (though Palmer’s novel reads like pure SF with a difficult to
explain fantastical intrusion, while Anders’ novel reads like Fantasy set in a
pretty SFnal near future.) All the Birds
in the Sky is the story of Patricia, who can talk to birds, and Lawrence,
who has invented a two-second time machine, as they grow up, both somewhat
dysfunctionally, and end up friends and sometime lovers in a near future facing
imminent collapse due to global warming. Both promote solutions – Patricia’s
fantastical, Lawrence’s science-fictional, and both make terrible mistakes,
before a literally earth-shaking conclusion. It’s funny – Anders is always
funny – and serious as well (Anders is usually serious too). I really liked it.
Too Like the Lightning is set
several centuries in the future, in a world divided into “Hives”, cooperative
family-like organizations with different strengths. The narrator is Mycroft
Canner, who, we slowly learn, is a criminal (and the nature of his crime, only
late revealed, is pretty appalling), but who is also quite engaging, and an
important mentor to an amazing child who can bring inanimate things to life. This
novel introduces a conflict – a threat to the world’s balance of power – and also
intricately sketches the complex background of this future, and introduces a
ton of neat characters. Then it stops, which is its main weakness – it is but
half a novel. The sequel (Seven
Surrenders) is due in March 2017. In the end I was impressed but
unsatisfied – leaving a novel perhaps not quite Hugo-worthy (though the author
is surely Campbell-worthy!), but a novel which will compel me to read its
sequel, which, if it sticks the dismount, might be Hugo-worthy itself.
Speaking of first novels, one that I haven't read but definitely need to get to is Ninefox Gambit, by Yoon Ha Lee. Lee has been doing really outstanding work for a long time -- I've used a few of his stories in my anthologies, and in a way it's a surprise that his first novel is only coming out now. But it looks very interesting indeed.
Speaking of first novels, one that I haven't read but definitely need to get to is Ninefox Gambit, by Yoon Ha Lee. Lee has been doing really outstanding work for a long time -- I've used a few of his stories in my anthologies, and in a way it's a surprise that his first novel is only coming out now. But it looks very interesting indeed.
Best Series
Considering this
brand new category reminds me of one novel that I have just read, Impersonations, by Walter Jon Williams,
a new pendant to his Praxis (or Dread Empire’s Fall) series. It’s a fun
story, and I’m glad I read it, but I don’t think it’s Hugo-worthy by itself. I
am strongly considering nominating the entire series for a Hugo, however.
And, indeed, that
hints at one of my misgivings about the Hugo for Best Series. The most recent entry
in a series may not be particularly representative of the series as a whole,
nor as good as the rest of the series. The same comment, obviously, applies to
Lois McMaster Bujold’s Vorkosigan
series, represented in 2016 by the rather pedestrian Gentleman Jole and the Red
Queen. I would say personally that both Bujold’s Vorkosigan series and Williams’
Praxis book are worthy, over all, of a Best Series Hugo, but that the best time
to award them that Hugo has passed. (Which, to be sure, is primarily a function
of this being a brand new award.)
At any rate, I was
wondering what the possible candidates for Best Series, eligible in 2016, might
be, and I was delighted to find that JJ, over at File 770, had done the heavy
lifting, producing this page with a good long list of potential eligible
series: http://file770.com/?p=30940.
Of those my
personal favorites are:
Dread Empire’s Fall, by Walter Jon Williams (note that JJ
lists Impersonations, the 2016 entry, as a novella,
though it seems more of a short novel to me, and Jonathan Strahan tells me it's about 55,000 words long)
The Vorkosigan Series, by Lois McMaster Bujold
The World of Five Gods, by Lois McMaster Bujold
The Expanse, by James S. A. Corey
The Fairyland Books, by Catherynne S. Valente
The Laundry Files, by Charles Stross
The Liaden Universe, by Steve Miller and Sharon Lee
The RCN Books (Leary/Mundy), by David Drake
Riverside, by Ellen Kushner
Temeraire, by Naomi Novik
Thessaly, by Jo Walton
And immediately I
see a problem – common to series, I think. While I’ve read and enjoyed many
books in each of these series, I’ve fallen behind in many of them. I didn’t
even know there were new entries in Ellen Kushner’s Riverside series or David Drake’s RCN books. (And, hey, speaking of problems with the Best Series
Hugo, does Delia Sherman get a Hugo too if the Riverside series wins, as she co-wrote one of the major novels in
that series, The Fall of the Kings?)
Which, by the way, isn’t a bad thing from my point of view – I’ll be glad to
grab the new books in both of those series.
There’s also a big
difference in the types of these series. Some comprise several books with a
fairly coherent story arc: certainly Jo Walton’s Thessaly books are a pretty tight trilogy; and the Temeraire and Expanse series, a bit more loosely, are still pretty coherent. Some
represent mostly just a universe in which to set stories, with perhaps some
sub-arcs: the Liaden books, the RCN books, the Vorkosigan books, for example. Dread
Empire’s Fall is an original closely unified trilogy, followed by two much
shorter pendants (one about each of the two main characters of the original
trilogy). I suppose this isn't really a fatal problem – the voters can judge for
themselves how to evaluate each of these types of series.
To be honest, I’m
not sure what, or even if, I’ll nominate. I will see if I can catch up in a
couple of the series I like but am behind in. There’s a good chance I’ll
nominate Kushner’s series, because I think it deserves the attention. Beyond
that, I just don’t know. I have enjoyed books in each of the series I listed –
I wouldn’t be bothered by any of them winning a Hugo (though many of them – not
that this is a bad thing, mind you – represent lighter entertainment than we
often think of for the Hugos – possibly this is partly the nature of long
series.)
Best YA Novel
This potential new award, as
I mentioned, would not be a Hugo, but would be administered and awarded by the World
Science Fiction Society. For this year, I have little to say – I really haven’t
read enough books in this category to make any ruling or recommendations. I can
recommend a look at the Locus Recommendation list, which includes a section on
YA novels: http://www.locusmag.com/News/2017/01/2016-locus-recommended-reading-list/.
I will say that I’m intrigued by the presence of Alastair Reynolds’ Revenger,
which I didn’t know was YA. And I’m sure that many of these books are very good
work indeed – but I haven’t read them, so further deponent sayeth not.
Dramatic Presentation
To my mind, this is
one of those years in which the Hugo for Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form,
should be awarded by acclamation, to Arrival,
an excellent film based on one of the very best SF stories of all time, Ted
Chiang’s “Story of Your Life”. Of course, being based on a good story doesn’t
guarantee a good film (as those who have seen the movie version of Nightfall can testify, or so I am given
to understand) – but Arrival is a
very good film (if not, to my mind, quite as good as the original story, which
is hardly a complaint, as the original story is so great).
Beyond that, I will
say that I enjoyed Rogue One, but
didn’t love it – it will probably get a nomination, and deservedly enough I
suppose, but it would be a disgrace if it won. I have seen suggestions that Hidden Figures could be nominated –
that seems silly to me, but I suppose it would get the Apollo 13 exception. (If so, can I nominate Michael Chabon’s Moonglow for Best Novel?) I don’t
really have any other obvious candidates.
As for Short Form, I
don’t watch Doctor Who so I’m not
allowed to nominate. (Joke!) Actually, I don’t watch that much TV – I just
started on The Magicians, which I am
enjoying so far, and I suspect I would like The Expanse, and I know there’s lots of other cool stuff out there.
But I haven’t seen enough to judge.