Old Bestseller Review: The Three Musketeers, by Alexandre Dumas

Review: The Three Musketeers, by Alexandre Dumas (with Auguste Maquet)

by Rich Horton

The Three Musketeers is Alexandre Dumas's most famous novel, and for many readers it is their favorite. I read it over 50 years ago, in my teens, and all I really remembered is the part at the beginning where D'Artagnan agrees to duel each of Athos, Porthos, and Aramais; and a general sense that I liked it. I have just reread it -- a combination of listening to a (free) Librivox recording and reading the 1950 translation, by Jacques Le Clercq, in the Modern Library edition. (I actually suspect that the book I read as a teen was the Grosset & Dunlap Junior Illustrated Library version, which was the Le Clercq translation, but abridged to about half the length of the original.)

My quick reaction? It's a very enjoyable novel. But it's not nearly as good as The Count of Monte Cristo, which is one of the most purely fun novels I have ever read. 

The novel was first serialized in a newspaper in 1844. I doubt it has ever been out of print since. It's a long novel, about 600 pages in my edition, though even at that length it's only about half the length of The Count of Monte Cristo. As I said, much of my reading was in the Librivox recording, which was done using an older (so public domain) translation, and which was read by a wide variety of volunteers. All of the readers were acceptable, but to be sure they varied -- some, I thought, got a bit too dramatic in rendering different voices, others read perhaps a bit too quickly -- but on the whole it was a fine production. The Le Clercq translation was better than public domain one used for the audiobook, but not radically so. The Modern Library edition includes a brief bio of Dumas, and an introdcution by Alan Furst, plus some commentary by Margaret Oliphant, Brander Matthews, and G. K. Chesterton. The commentary -- dating to the late 19th and early 20th century -- is interesting, and discusses things like the authorship question, which even by then had been pretty conclusively resolved in favor of Auguste Maquet's significant contributions to the major Dumas novels.

I'll skip biographical information and instead link to my review of The Count of Monte Cristo, which does include a potted biography.

So, to the novel, fairly briefly. And there will be spoilers, as I assume the book is very familiar to many readers, but I'll put some space before the real spoilers.

At the opening, the 17 year old D'Artagnan, in 1825, leaves his native Gascony and heads to Paris, hoping to join the musketeers, who are commanded by one M. Treville, who had known D'Artagnan's father. On the way, he runs into a man at an inn, accompanied by a beautiful woman. The man casually insults him, and also steals the letter of introduction his father had addressed to Treville. D'Artagnan is ready to fight the man immediately, but is given no chance, and his is intrigued by the woman.

In Paris he meets the three musketeers, as I noted, and manages to be introduced to Treville, who has him assigned to a lesser unit. Athos, Porthos, and Aramis, who are already "The Inseperables", invited D'Artagnan into their circle after their schedule series of duels is interrupted by Cardinal Richelieu's henchmen, and so D'Artagnan and company fight the Cardinal's men instead, which gives D'Artagnan the chance to impress the others.

For the next while, the book is really involved in setting in motion the main plot. A lot of it deals with the financial precarity of the four men, and also with their "lackeys". All eight characters -- the four musketeers and the four lackeys, are nicely differentiated. There is some additional intrigue: D'Artagnan falls in love with the landlord's wife, Madame Bonacieux, who is in the service of the Queen, Anne of Austria. The Queen is in love with one of Charles I of England's main ministers, the Duke of Buckingham. (Buckingham is an historical figure, and it treated somewhat more kindly in this book than his real reputation suggests. In real life he was a bisexual libertine, likely James I's lover, and a really bad minister who had a big role in making Charles' reign the disaster it was. While he did possibly dally with Anne of Austria, it was not the desperate affair depicted here.) Anyway, D'Artagnan ends up deputized to recover a gift of diamonds the Queen had made to Buckingham, because the Cardinal had discovered this and planned to embarrass the Queen, his enemy, by revealing that she did not have the diamonds, originally a gift from her husband, Louis XIII.) This is a fine adventure sequence, but a side effect is that D'Artagnan engenders the hatred of Milady Clark, and Frenchwoman who had married an English noble, but who spied for Cardinal Richelieu. And one result of this -- combined with Richelieu's suspicion of all four musketeers -- is that Madame Bonacieux is kidnapped. 

By roughly this time, it is 1828, and the musketeers will be part of the army that the King and Cardinal are sending to La Rochelle, a city held by the Huguenots. The Cardinal is done tolerating the presence of Protestants in France, which has been allowed openly since Henry IV (a Protestant who converted to Catholicism in order to become King ("the throne is worth a Mass")) had issued the Edict of Nantes. So La Rochelle is besieged, and the the English are ready to send ships to support the Huguenots, under Buckingham's command. The Cardinal schemes to stop this ... and our heroes are involved for a complicated variety of reasons, including Athos's personal history, D'Artagnan's multiple intrigues with women (at least three are involved to some degree ... All this is resolved in very exciting fashion, with some comic episodes, some breakneck chases, some surprising revelations, and some tragedy. 

I would add that while The Three Musketeers is not exactly punctilious in hewing to true history, some of the critical events in the book are taken directly from historical happenings, so I recommend not boning up in the history of the siege of La Rochelle and such until you finish the novel. (I waited, and I'm glad.)

Spoilers will follow ....

Things I found interesting, and maybe a bit disappointing. One is the way the chief villains morphs from Richelieu to Milady about halfway through the book. Richelieu is just a schemer, who is often sincerely working for the good of France, if in shady ways. But Milady is an out and out psychopath. That can be fascinating, but also a bit overdone. Secondly, you can't help but noticing that by the end, the musketeers for the most part completely fail. They are trying to save Buckingham. He is killed (an historical fact, to be sure.) They are trying to rescue Madame Bonacieux. She is killed. They are trying to foil Richelieu. He succeeds, and by the end realizes that even the execution of Milady is probably to his benefit. 

Indeed this is an oddly nonromantic novel. Athos' only attachment is to his wife -- Milady, who of course he hates. Aramis' love affair is essentially completely offstage. Porthos is involved with a not very attractive somewhat older woman, and his main interest is her money. D'Artagnan falls for at least three women: Madame Bonacieux, Milady, and Milady's servant Kitty. Now mind you this probably consistent with his character. But he doesn't end up with any of them (and indeed we don't really know what happens to Kitty.)

And finally, the ending is kind of morose. There are two sequels to the novel, sometimes published in as many as five additional volumes. The only famous one of those is the section of the third novel that is sometimes published separately as The Man in the Iron Mask. But for all that the story was continued, The Three Musketeers closes as if no sequel was planned or needed, and the four friends are separated. 

None of this means the novel was a failure. It's lots of fun. It's often funny, often exciting. It's a very good adventure novel. But I'll repeat -- The Count of Monte Cristo is peak Dumas. But I know many readers I trust rank them in the opposite order!