Saturday, April 12, 2025

Review: The Curious Case of the Somnambulist and the Psychic Thief, by Lisa Tuttle

Review: The Curious Case of the Somnambulist and the Psychic Thief, by Lisa Tuttle

by Rich Horton

Lisa Tuttle began publishing with a story in a Clarion anthology in 1972, and in the ensuing years built a reputation as one of the field's most interesting writers, mostly at shorter lengths though she published several novels. I hadn't read any of her novels (except her collaboration with George R. R. Martin, Windhaven) though I kept track of her short fiction over the decades, and a while back I noticed two entertaining stories in large anthologies edited by George R. R. Martin and Gardner Dozois. These two stories were about a pair of investigators of supernatural crimes in the late Victorian Era, Jasper Jesperson and Miss Lane, and they were lots of fun.

However, I never learned that she had published three novels about the two until last year. The reason is simple enough -- the books aren't available (except in ebook form) in the US. I went ahead and bought the first in the series, The Curious Affair of the Somnambulist and the Psychic Thief, from 2016. (The sequels are The Curious Affair of the Witch at Wayside Cross (2017) and The Curious Affair of the Missing Mummies (2023).) It took me until now to get around to reading the first book, though. 

The Curious Case of the Somnambulist and the Psychic Thief is an origin story for the Jesperson and Lane partnership (though it was already established in the two previously published short stories.) Miss Lane is the primary narrator, and as the novel opens she has left her position with the Society of Psychical Research (SPR) because she has learned that her friend and mentor, Gabrielle Fox, is willingly to abet psychic frauds. Miss Lane heads to London in need of a job -- and she sees Jasper Jesperson's advertisement, looking for an assistant in his private detective business. Jesperson is a young man, living with his mother, and a man of apparent ability but unable to hold a conventional job. He and his mother are down to their last few pounds -- but they gladly welcome Miss Lane into the business, and their house. I should add that this is about 1890, and Arthur Conan Doyle is publishing the Sherlock Holmes stories -- which server as a sort of model for Jesperson and Lane.

But starting a business is tricky, and finally in desperation they see if their landlord will extend credit on their rent if they investigate any problems he has. And fortuitously there is something to look into -- their landlord's brother-in-law has been sleepwalking. Perhaps they can see what might have caused this? Is there something sinister behind it?

So that's the somnambulist. What about the psychic thief? Again somewhat fortuitously, Gabrielle Fox reenters the picture. She is back in London, and she is with a woman who claims to have psychic powers. Soon she has invited Miss Lane to a séance. And things start to get crazy: psychics are being kidnapped. A couple of them even seem to have real powers. And an American psychic, with a Russian princess for a wife, seems particularly powerful -- and, soon, particularly interested in Miss Lane.

This is all quite fun stuff. The Victorian milieu is well enough depicted -- I've been buried in Victorian fiction for a while now and the real stuff is inevitably more convincing but Tuttle didn't throw me out of the novel with anything too silly. The two main characters are very much worth spending time with. The mystery -- is just OK, I have to say. (Once magic is involved it's harder to keep mysteries properly mysterious!) Having said that, the setpiece climax is quite nicely done. I'll be getting around to the sequels sooner or later.


Thursday, April 10, 2025

Answers to the Victorian Fiction Quiz

Answers to the Victorian Fiction Quiz 

The answers are given in bold below. If you want to see the questions first without the answers, my original post of the quiz is here.


1. By the 1890s, English morés seemed to shift away from the traditionally stuffy image of Victorians (exaggerated as that image may be). The writer who represented that shift most directly might be the Irishman Oscar Wilde, author of plays such as Lady Windermere's Fan, poems such as "The Ballad of Reading Gaol" and "The Sphinx", and what short novel, which might fancifully be read as allegorizing the decadence that could be seen as lying beneath the decorative exterior of the art of the "Naughty '90s"?

The Picture of Dorian Gray

2. Charles Dickens' first several novels were published under a pseudonym and several of them, as well as some later works, were illustrated by Hablot Knight Browne, who chose the pseudonym "Phiz" to correspond with Dickens' pseudonym. Give Dickens' one-syllable pseudonym.

Boz

3. Elizabeth Gaskell is loved for her novels Cranford, Wives and Daughters, and a novel that was serialized in Charles Dickens' magazine Household Words right after Dickens' own Hard Times. Both Gaskell's and Dickens' books are considered "industrial novels", and both were set in Manchester (Gaskell's home, though Gaskell renamed the city Milton.) Name this book, which had a BBC adaptation in 2004, and the title of which refers to the protagonist's split time between London (and a nearby village), and her new home in Milton. 

North and South

4. Anthony Trollope, author of the Barsetshire and Palliser novels among many others, was famous for his prolificity. But despite the many novels (and often very long novels!) he wrote, he was also a very energetic worker in another area, part of the civil service of the United Kingdom. For which part of the civil service did Trollope work?

General Post Office (anything hinting postal service or mail was accepted)

5. George Eliot was a bête noire for many high school students in my time who were forced to read Silas Marner, though these days she is (deservedly) a golden girl for her novel Middlemarch. (I say Middlemarch is transcendent, and Silas Marner is a fine short novel.) Those novels, and much of the rest of her work, were set in the 18th and 19th centuries in provincial England. But Eliot went far afield -- to Italy in the 15th Century -- for which novel published in 1863? (This novel's title is also the first name of an actress who appeared in an adaptation of Eliot's novel Daniel Deronda as well as several other period pieces.)

Romola

6. Three English sisters published novels in the 1840s that are still regarded as classics today. Their first books were published under a common surname, Bell. Their brother Branwell published some poetry but no novels. Name any one of the three pseudonymous first names the sisters used, each of which had a first letter matching the author's real first name.

Currer, Acton, Ellis

7. Stanley Kubrick's 1974 film Barry Lyndon is adapted from a novel by William Makepeace Thackeray, who also wrote Henry Esmond (my personal favorite), The Rose and the Ring, and, most famously, a novel which takes its title from John Bunyan's decidedly non-Victorian allegory The Pilgrim's Progress. Give the title of that novel.

Vanity Fair

8. The now common practice of titling novels with quotes from poems doesn't appear to have begun until the Victorian Era (though there may be earlier examples.) Dickens' The Cricket on the Hearth (1845) takes its title from Milton's "Il Penseroso", and Rhoda Broughton's Red as the Rose is She, from 1870, uses a quote from Coleridge's "Rime of the Ancient Mariner". Just four years later, Thomas Hardy had his first major success with which novel titled after a line from Thomas Grey's "Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard"?

Far from the Madding Crowd

9. "The Jewel in the Crown" of the British Empire was India. Needless to say, the record of the British Empire in India is highly checkered. There was a writer who was technically a subject of Queen Victoria, born in Calcutta (now Kolkata), educated in India and England, who wrote major plays such as Risarjan (or Sacrifice), from 1890, poetry such as the collection Gitanjali, novels including 1901's Nastanirh (later filmed as Charulata by Satyajit Ray), and numerous short stories such as "Atottju" ("The Runaway"). In 1913 he became the first non-European to be awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature. Who was this polymath?

Rabindranath Tagore

10. Some of the Victorian novelists were also poets, though only a couple achieved significant reputations. But one major poet produced an epic poem, Aurora Leigh, that the author called a "novel in verse", and which was called by the influential critic John Ruskin "the greatest long poem of the nineteenth century". Please give the first and last name of this poet, who was married to another major Victorian poet.

Elizabeth Barrett Browning (Elizabeth with either last name or both was accepted)

11. I loved Robert Louis Stevenson's novels as a child, such as Kidnapped, Treasure Island, The Black Arrow and Catriona, and I continue to enjoy such books as The New Arabian Nights as an adult. Stevenson traveled widely in his brief life -- he lived at times in his birthplace of Scotland, in England, in France, and in the United States (home of his wife Fanny.) He spent his last few years in what South Seas island group?

Samoa (or Western Samoa, or the Samoan Islands, or even Upolu, the island on which RLS lived, were accepted)

12. One of the best and most prolific Victorian woman authors was Margaret Oliphant, who wrote over 90 novels between 1849 and her death in 1897. Perhaps her best work (at least in my eyes) is which 1883 novel in which the title woman crosses horns with her older cousin, as both eventually forsake marriage and instead work to maintain the family's bank in place of their feckless male connections? The title character shares a name with the tragic main character of a colorfully titled major American novel published during Victoria's reign. (First name only.)

Hester

13. Leo Tolstoy published the bulk of his work during Victoria's reign, though he was of course not one of her subjects. But he did, for example, admire both Dickens and Trollope, and indeed Anna Karenina is shown reading a novel that seems clearly to be by Trollope on the fateful train journey at which she meets Vronsky (that cad!) and also witnesses what tragic foreshadowing incident? 

Person killed by train

14. "Sensation novels" were very popular in England in the second half of the 19th century, showing scandalous doings behind the facades of seemingly ordinary families. Wilkie Collins was one of the first such novelists, and Rhoda Broughton a later example, but what woman, an actress in her teens, made a fortune in that genre, most notably with Lady Audley's Secret.

Mary Elizabeth Braddon

15. Herman Melville is undoubtedly best known for Moby-Dick, but I love the last novel he published in his lifetime, which sold so poorly it ended not just his career but bankrupted his publisher. I'm sure you can tell me its title. 

The Confidence Man: His Masquerade (just The Confidence Man was enough)

16. One of the most popular French novelists of the Victorian era was Alexandre Dumas, author of such enduring classics as The Count of Monte Cristo and The Three Musketeers. Dumas' son, also named Alexandre, was also a successful writer. He is best known today for a novel that was the source material for a great opera by Verdi. Give either the title of the novel (in French or English), or of Verdi's opera that was based on it.

La Dame Aux Camellias/The Lady of the Camellias/Camille; or La Traviata or The Fallen Woman (though I've never heard the opera actually called that!)

17. Queen Victoria died in 1901, and there are of course writers whose career encompassed both her reign and those of her successors. One of the greatest published his most famous novel in the year of Victoria's death. This writer's stories published in Victoria's reign were often set in India, where he lived in early adulthood, though an important book of stories for children seems to be set in Africa. Just who was this man?

Rudyard Kipling

18. This author of The Ordeal of Richard Feverel and The Egoist was also a well-respected poet, who wrote the lyric that inspired one of Ralph Vaughan Williams' most popular orchestral pieces, The Lark Ascending.

George Meredith

Wednesday, April 9, 2025

Review: Rakesfall, by Vajra Chandrasekera

Review: Rakesfall, by Vajra Chandrasekera

by Rich Horton

Vajra Chandrasekera made a big (and deserved) splash with his first novel, The Saint of Bright Doors, which won the Nebula Award last year. Rakesfall is his second novel, and it is if anything even more ambitious than his first, and it has been nominted for this year's Nebula. It is intricately -- and to be honest, sometimes confusingly -- structured. It is very well written. It audaciously mixes fantasy and science fiction -- and the fantastical parts are original and intriguing, while the science fiction ventures into the very far future with some very cool technological speculation. It even briefly visits the milieu of The Saint of Bright Doors. I was really primed to love it -- but I felt Chandrasekera didn't quite pull it off. 

Rakesfall opens with an excitingly confusing narrative -- a group of people -- a "fandom" -- are watching a TV series following the lives of a girl named Annelid and a boy named Leveret, shown on an old TV. The "fandom" seems possibly to consist entirely of dead people, and Annelid and Leveret seem to sometimes watch the "fandom" on their own TV. This is strange and cool ... and then we are in another milieu, and then another, and another ... And there are stories within stories. There is a long sequence in which the viewpoint character (seemingly a version of Annelid called Vidyucchika) is haunted by a corpse (a version of Leveret called Lambajihva) while living in a house whose owner's husband and son are both, well, undead. There is a justifiedly angry sequence set in Sri Lanka during the recent wars. Things jump forward to increasingly far futures, with a ruined Earth subject to ambiguously successful attempts at restoration, and with humanity spread into space, and also into digital worlds. Some of the embedded stories are real tours de force -- a postmodernist play about the horrible history of European colonization of Sri Lanka; and a fairy tale of sorts about Kings and Heroes and Wasps in particular. 

It's impressive, urgently and often beautifully written. It's powerfully felt. It's new, it's original. And ... for me, it didn't quite work. My main problem was the last half or so, in which the SF speculation kind of goes off the rails for me, and which was for some time rather boring, and by the end rather banal. This is a shame, because Chandrasekera can really write, and because his aims are impressive. Better, I think, that he try things like Rakesfall than settle for the routine -- but it's a risk/reward game, and sometimes the risks win. I'll add that perhaps the fault is with me -- perhaps it is my failure to understand the book more than the author's failure that I'm displaying. Fair enough! (Though I think the banality of the concluding segment is real.)

Is Rakesfall worth reading? Yes. Is Chandrasekera one of the most exciting newer writers in the field? Absolutely. In a way, the fact that he isn't afraid to do something as audacious as this novel, even if (in my opinion) the result is flawed, is good news. Because his next effort may be just as audacious -- and may absolutely nail it.

Sunday, April 6, 2025

Review: Phineas Finn, by Anthony Trollope

Review: Phineas Finn, by Anthony Trollope

by Rich Horton

(In the belief that some people coming to this post might be interested in Victoriana, I will note that I have posted a quiz about Victorian Fiction that I recently wrote for an online trivia league. The quiz is here: Victorian Fiction Quiz.)

Phineas Finn (sometimes subtitled The Irish Member) is the second novel in Trollope's Palliser, or Parliamentary, series of novels. The series comprises six novels. I read the first, Can You Forgive Her?, about a year ago. It seems, however, that Phineas Finn begins what might be considered the main story arc of the books, which is continued in the final three volumes: Phineas Redux, The Prime Minister, and The Duke's Children. (The Eustace Diamonds is book three.) All six books share many characters, most of whom are significant players in the political world, and some of whom are evidently based on the actual Parliamentary leaders of the time, people like Disraeli and Gladstone. It should also be noted that these books are also connected to an extent with the Barsetshire novels -- for example, Plantagenet Palliser, probably the most important character in the series, is introduced in the fifth Barsetshire novel, The Small House at Allington, and his father, the Duke of Omnium, is an important minor character in the Barsetshire books, and is also a very important minor character in Phineas Finn. It does appear to me that the four Palliser books of the main arc should probably be read in the order of publication, but the other two books needn't be. (Though there is a key subplot in Can You Forgive Her? that sets up the future of Plantagent Palliser and his wife, Lady Glencora, in ways that do impact Phineas Finn.)

OK, that's just introductory blather. What about this novel? Phineas Finn is a young Irishman -- 25 at the opening of the book, 30 at its conclusion -- the son of a doctor in County Clare. He studied at Trinity, and has spent the previous few years in London, studying for the Bar. He is ready for his professional life, and suddenly the opportunity arises for him to take a seat in Parliament: the seat for Loughshire, near his father's home, is controlled by one of his father's patients, Lord Tulla. Lord Tulla has quarreled with his brother, who holds the seat, and is looking for another man to take over. Soon Phineas is back in London as the MP for Loughshire. As MPs are not paid, he must still live on the small amount his father can afford. But his life's ambition is to be in politics. 

That sets up the political plot of the novel, which concerns the first five years of Phineas Finn's career. He must navigate a course between his Liberal principles and various expediencies, such as keeping his seat (Lord Tulla is a Tory) and even keeping his borough in existence, as the Reform Bills which are the main controversy of the day will significantly redistribute the boroughs, to more fairly equalize representation. Even within the Liberal Party, he has issues of conscience -- must he do what the Party leaders wish, even if they differ from his own beliefs? All these elements reverberate through the novel, as for example he gains a (paid, crucially) Cabinet position, but if he bucks the Party leaders at any point, he must resign. This might seem dry, but it is not, in Trollope's telling. Part of this is Trollope's voice. Part is Trollope's knowledge -- which included a run for Parliament (though that was after writing Phineas Finn.) Part is that he uses these issues both for delineation of character, and discussion of governing theory, etc.

The other key plot is about Phineas Finn's personal life -- which is to say, mostly, his love life. There are four women in the book whom he calls lovers (or who, in one case, thinks of him as a potential lover.) These are Lady Laura Standish, who is intensely interested in politics and strongly supports Phineas' career. Then Violet Effingham, Lady Laura's friend, whom Laura wishes will marry her rackety brother. Violet is beautiful and intelligent and very independent in spirit. And there is Marie, Madame Max Goesler, a beautiful widow just a few years older than Phineas. Madame Max is very wealthy, very intelligent -- and, possibly, Jewish and of lower class origins. Finally, there is Mary Flood Jones, a good friend of Phineas' sister. Phineas has enjoyed her company while in Ireland, and probably has given her reason to believe he might marry her. She is pretty, and affectionate, and loyal -- and it seems not nearly as intelligent and interesting as the other women. 

There are ups and down, dramatic (even shocking) events in both threads, and the two intersect interestingly and effectively. There are extensive parts which don't directly involve Phineas -- one truly terrible marriage is closely examined, the behind the scenes influence of powerful women on the political world they are technically barred from is depicted, the attitudes and actions of ordinary people (that is to say, neither politicians nor aristocrats) are given voice. There are comic interludes, and tragic ones. Two of my favorite chapters are in essence almost entirely in the voice of other characters -- the one is called "Violet Effingham", and lets her discuss at length her attitudes about marriage; the other is called "Mr Monk Upon Reform", and is primarily a letter from Mr Monk (one of Phineas' political mentors) detailing his beliefs on the reform of the electoral system in the UK, and on the reasons it is desirable, and the shape of the best outcome. 

I'm trying not to detail much at all about the actual plot. Phineas's career, both political and personal, has high points and low points, and ends mostly happily, though with some ambiguity and a lot of stress -- and, of course, there will be further changes ahead, elaborated mostly, I assume, in Phineas Redux. Phineas himself is a fine character, a good man with flaws, a rather lucky man whose successes are partly due to his abilities, but also to his good looks, and to sheer good fortune. The three English women he is involved with -- Lady Laura, Violet, and Madame Max -- are wonderful characters. There is a host of minor characters who are intriguing: Phineas' fellow Irish MP Laurence Fitzgibbon; the journalist Quintus Slide; Mr. Low, the barrister who teaches Phineas the law; Mr and Mrs Bunce, Phineas' landlords; Plantagenet Palliser's wife, Lady Glencora; Lady Laura's unstable but oddly likeable brother Lord Chiltern; and many more. 

I have now read seven of Trollope's novels, all with at least some enjoyment, and most with immense enjoyment, but I think Phineas Finn is (so far!) my favorite. I said recently somewhere that, while Dickens and Eliot are undoubtedly greater novelists than Trollope, Trollope is more enjoyable. Does Trollope's hand on the scales sometimes noticeably influence the outcome? Sure (but so does Dickens' hand.) Is Eliot's moral and philosophical view of the world more complex than Trollope's? Yes, though Trollope's ideas are by no means negligible. Is Trollope's prose less energetic and surprising than Dickens', and less elegant than Eliot's? Definitely, though Trollope is never less than readable. What can I say? Trollope is a wonderful writer who deserves to be read, and will reward the reader. 

Saturday, April 5, 2025

Quiz: Victorian Fiction

Over the past years I've posted some quizzes I've written for an online trivia league I play in. These quizzes have a format of 12 questions each, but naturally I typically write at least 15 questions before figuring out which work best. This year I outdid myself, and wrote 18 questions (with the help of Michael Moorcock, who made a few suggestions, one of which is in the list below.)

The theme was Victorian Fiction, originally intended to be concerning any fiction written during Queen Victoria's reign (1837-1901). After running the questions by a number of volunteer testers, I decided that it was best to restrict it to fiction written by actual subjects of Queen Victoria -- that is to say, anyone from the British Empire during her reign (in the end I included writers from England, Scotland, Ireland, and India -- abashedly, I realized I don't really know many writers from Canada or Australia or other British colonies from that period. (I read a Canadian SF novel from 1896 while writing the quiz, but that novel was so obscure I suspect I am one of maybe a dozen people alive who have read it, and in fact I alerted both the Science Fiction Encyclopedia and the ISFDB to its existence.))

I'll post the answers in a few days. Give your guesses in the comments if you feel like it.

So, here are the questions: 

1. By the 1890s, English morés seemed to shift away from the traditionally stuffy image of Victorians (exaggerated as that image may be). The writer who represented that shift most directly might be the Irishman Oscar Wilde, author of plays such as Lady Windermere's Fan, poems such as "The Ballad of Reading Gaol" and "The Sphinx", and what short novel, which might fancifully be read as allegorizing the decadence that could be seen as lying beneath the decorative exterior of the art of the "Naughty '90s"?

2. Charles Dickens' first several novels were published under a pseudonym and several of them, as well as some later works, were illustrated by Hablot Knight Browne, who chose the pseudonym "Phiz" to correspond with Dickens' pseudonym. Give Dickens' one-syllable pseudonym.

3. Elizabeth Gaskell is loved for her novels Cranford, Wives and Daughters, and a novel that was serialized in Charles Dickens' magazine Household Words right after Dickens' own Hard Times. Both Gaskell's and Dickens' books are considered "industrial novels", and both were set in Manchester (Gaskell's home, though Gaskell renamed the city Milton.) Name this book, which had a BBC adaptation in 2004, and the title of which refers to the protagonist's split time between London (and a nearby village), and her new home in Milton. 

4. Anthony Trollope, author of the Barsetshire and Palliser novels among many others, was famous for his prolificity. But despite the many novels (and often very long novels!) he wrote, he was also a very energetic worker in another area, part of the civil service of the United Kingdom. For which part of the civil service did Trollope work?

5. George Eliot was a bête noire for many high school students in my time who were forced to read Silas Marner, though these days she is (deservedly) a golden girl for her novel Middlemarch. (I say Middlemarch is transcendent, and Silas Marner is a fine short novel.) Those novels, and much of the rest of her work, were set in the 18th and 19th centuries in provincial England. But Eliot went far afield -- to Italy in the 15th Century -- for which novel published in 1863? (This novel's title is also the first name of an actress who appeared in an adaptation of Eliot's novel Daniel Deronda as well as several other period pieces.)

6. Three English sisters published novels in the 1840s that are still regarded as classics today. Their first books were published under a common surname, Bell. Their brother Branwell published some poetry but no novels. Name any one of the three pseudonymous first names the sisters used, each of which had a first letter matching the author's real first name.

7. Stanley Kubrick's 1974 film Barry Lyndon is adapted from a novel by William Makepeace Thackeray, who also wrote Henry Esmond (my personal favorite), The Rose and the Ring, and, most famously, a novel which takes its title from John Bunyan's decidedly non-Victorian allegory The Pilgrim's Progress. Give the title of that novel.

8. The now common practice of titling novels with quotes from poems doesn't appear to have begun until the Victorian Era (though there may be earlier examples.) Dickens' The Cricket on the Hearth (1845) takes its title from Milton's "Il Penseroso", and Rhoda Broughton's Red as the Rose is She, from 1870, uses a quote from Coleridge's "Rime of the Ancient Mariner". Just four years later, Thomas Hardy had his first major success with which novel titled after a line from Thomas Grey's "Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard"?

9. "The Jewel in the Crown" of the British Empire was India. Needless to say, the record of the British Empire in India is highly checkered. There was a writer who was technically a subject of Queen Victoria, born in Calcutta (now Kolkata), educated in India and England, who wrote major plays such as Risarjan (or Sacrifice), from 1890, poetry such as the collection Gitanjali, novels including 1901's Nastanirh (later filmed as Charulata by Satyajit Ray), and numerous short stories such as "Atottju" ("The Runaway"). In 1913 he became the first non-European to be awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature. Who was this polymath?

10. Some of the Victorian novelists were also poets, though only a couple achieved significant reputations. But one major poet produced an epic poem, Aurora Leigh, that the author called a "novel in verse", and which was called by the influential critic John Ruskin "the greatest long poem of the nineteenth century". Please give the first and last name of this poet, who was married to another major Victorian poet.

11. I loved Robert Louis Stevenson's novels as a child, such as Kidnapped, Treasure Island, The Black Arrow and Catriona, and I continue to enjoy such books as The New Arabian Nights as an adult. Stevenson traveled widely in his brief life -- he lived at times in his birthplace of Scotland, in England, in France, and in the United States (home of his wife Fanny.) He spent his last few years in what South Seas island group?

12. One of the best and most prolific Victorian woman authors was Margaret Oliphant, who wrote over 90 novels between 1849 and her death in 1897. Perhaps her best work (at least in your smith's eyes) is which 1883 novel in which the title woman crosses horns with her older cousin, as both eventually forsake marriage and instead work to maintain the family's bank in place of their feckless male connections? The title character shares a name with the tragic main character of a colorfully titled major American novel published during Victoria's reign. (First name only.)

Here are two questions that didn't make the final cut, the first because the writer was not a subject of Queen Victoria, and the second because the testers thought the question very hard, and I couldn't figure out how to supply any particularly good hints.

13. Leo Tolstoy published the bulk of his work during Victoria's reign, though he was of course not one of her subjects. But he did, for example, admire both Dickens and Trollope, and indeed Anna Karenina is shown reading a novel that seems clearly to be by Trollope on the fateful train journey at which she meets Vronsky (that cad!) and also witnesses what tragic foreshadowing incident

14. "Sensation novels" were very popular in England in the second half of the 19th century, showing scandalous doings behind the facades of seemingly ordinary families. Wilkie Collins was one of the first such novelists, and Rhoda Broughton a later example, but what woman, an actress in her teens, made a fortune in that genre, most notably with Lady Audley's Secret.

And here are the other questions I cut:

15. Herman Melville is undoubtedly best known for Moby-Dick, but I love the last novel he published in his lifetime, which sold so poorly it ended not just his career but bankrupted his publisher. I'm sure you can tell me its title. 

16. One of the most popular French novelists of the Victorian era was Alexandre Dumas, author of such enduring classics as The Count of Monte Cristo and The Three Musketeers. Dumas' son, also named Alexandre, was also a successful writer. He is best known today for a novel that was the source material for a great opera by Verdi. Give either the title of the novel (in French or English), or of Verdi's opera that was based on it.

17. Queen Victoria died in 1901, and there are of course writers whose career encompassed both her reign and those of her successors. One of the greatest published his most famous novel in the year of Victoria's death. This writer's stories published in Victoria's reign were often set in India, where he lived in early adulthood, though an important book of stories for children seems to be set in Africa. Just who was this man?

And this was Michael Moorcock's suggestion:

18. This author of The Ordeal of Richard Feverel and The Egoist was also a well-respected poet, who wrote the lyric that inspired one of Ralph Vaughan Williams' most popular orchestral pieces, The Lark Ascending.



Wednesday, April 2, 2025

Review: The Forever War, by Joe Haldeman

Review: The Forever War, by Joe Haldeman

by Rich Horton

This review will be full of spoilers -- it's a classic SF novel, and pretty much everyone in the field (except John Scalzi :) ) has read it. Short answer: it's definitely worth reading -- a bitter and cynical look at war, some cool ideas including the effect of time dilation and lots of physics, a somewhat transcendent but pretty creepy conclusion. And, also, some very '70s things, including pretty questionable -- at times downright offensive -- "sexual revolution" era sexual politics, and oddly 70s-ish notions of dystopia.

To my impressions:

I read The Forever War back in 1975 when it came out, mostly in the Analog quasi-serialization, though I bought the paperback too. I had to get the first two parts of the novel out of the library as I didn't start buying Analog until the August 1974 issue. The last two sections (in Analog) were in the fourth and sixth issues I bought. I liked it then and I endorsed its Hugo and Nebula wins. But if I am telling the truth, my memories from 50 years ago have become pretty dim, so I only recall the basic outline: William Mandella is drafted into a war against the aliens, there are several very impressive battle scenes, he falls in love with fellow soldier Marygay Potter, they are separated by time dilation, the war ends when it is realized the whole thing was a mistake due to poor communication, Marygay waits for William by flying back and forth in a spaceship until time dilation means their timelines are synchronized again.

We scheduled it for our book club this month, so I finally reread it. I got a Kindle edition, partly because I had heard that a significant chunk of the novel had been rejected by Ben Bova at Analog, and had only been added back to the book edition much later. The funny thing is, that chunk, was published as a separate novella in the November 1975 Amazing. And I don't remember it at all! -- even though I was buying Amazing at the time. I don't even remember the other stories in that issue, nor do I recognize the cover. Either my memory is completely shot -- possible! -- or I somehow missed that issue -- I don't think I had subscribed yet.

What did I think on a reread? It's still a pretty effective book. The telling is cynical in a totally believable way. The Army scenes ring very true -- and Haldeman would certainly be a better authority than me anyway. The soldiers are foulmouthed, dislike their commanding officers, but fairly disciplined if only because the alternative is dying. From my perspective a couple of things bothered me. One: in the Army "confraternity" -- sexual relastions with your fellow soldiers of the opposite sex -- is essentially mandatory, and (at least for a while) on a rotation basis. This seesm that it would be particularly hard on the women -- and there are hints of this in the novel. But only hints -- for the most part people seem happy to be always ready for sex and to be bedding a different person each night. In reality -- probably not much fun for most women, and, really, not so much fun for lots of men. Two: the casualty numbers are incredible, probably significantly higher than Russian casualties in Ukraine (and partly for a similar reason -- the politicians on Earth don't care.) Even worse, part of this is to my mind very avoidable casualties during trainging. Three: I don't quite buy the concept of only recruiting geniuses (150+ IQ) for the Army. I get that there's some satirical point to that, but still.

That said, it's very exciting, and well-written. The battle setups are interesting, and seem like a plausible use of the technology Haldeman invents. Some of this tech is pretty implausible, but in an almost believable fashion. The new section, originally called "You Can Never Go Back", concerns William and Marygay's return to Earth after their battles, at which time they are eligible to muster out. They describe at thoroughly decayed Earth society, in a very '70s fashion. Homosexuality is encourage as a population control measure (though -- as Mandella even points out -- birth control is pretty easy to enforce anyway.) Haldeman's depiction of homosexuality is mostly positive, I suppose, but there are some cliches, which I understand he regretted in later years. The rest of the depiction of Earth at that time seems a bit over the top -- but partly it's a device to make it plausible that the two of them reup.

The social changes from then on remain interesting. Homosexuality is eventually mandatory, and enforced by medical treatments. All births are by artificial insemination and by using artificial wombs. There are algorithms to ensure genetic compatibility for "better" children. The novel takes a somewhat neutral stance towards this, though I find it horrifying. And the final fate of mankind -- where every one is clones of a single individual, linked a sort of hivemind, is appalling, and really dangerous. There is a backup plan -- a few planets where heterosexual relationships and natural birth is allowed -- which of course is where William and Marygay end up. But seriously -- what is "good", what is valuable, what sort of art would be possible, etc. etc., in a world with only one actual individual. It's really truly terrible. 

Anyway, it remains a good novel. As with so many books, it doesn't hold up as well 50 years later -- I wasn't as impressed as I remember being back then. Nonetheless, it definitely heralded an outstanding careers, and beginning some time in the 1990s I got in the habit of reading every Joe Haldeman novel as they came out, every 2 years or so, and they are reliably strong work. (My favorites are The Hemingway Hoax, The Coming, and Old Twentieth.)